Topic Identifier

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 17 to 20 of 20

Thread: FOR HEARING AT CIC SCHEDULED ON 21ST APRIL-08. and clarification on sec 8(1)(g)

  1. Re: FOR HEARING AT CIC SCHEDULED ON 21ST APRIL-08. and clarification on sec 8(1)(g)


    Section 2 [j] (ii) mandates certified copies of documents or records. Even if covering letter is signed by cpio, it is difficult to prove in court/tribunal that the enclosures are the same which have been forwarded by cpio under the covering letter signed by him. In my friend's case, 201 papers were enclosed to letter by cpio without certifying these papers, though we had asked for certified photocopies. The matter is now pending with CIC, with other issues against a nationalised bank.


    It takes each of us to make difference for all of us.

  2. #18
    Posts
    44,512
    Name:
    C J Karira
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    553

    Re: FOR HEARING AT CIC SCHEDULED ON 21ST APRIL-08. and clarification on sec 8(1)(g)


    jps50,

    Umapathi has already asked for "certified copies".
    He got them with a signed covering letter and the copies attached (without certification)
    He was aggrieved by this and therefore went for First Appeal and Second Appeal.

    In the second appeal, the respondent has claimed that copies given with a signed covering letter is as good as "certified copies". CIC has agreed with the respondent.

    The review petition has to filed on this point.

    Your point about applicability of Sec 2(j)(ii) is already over and done with.
    Twitter: @cjkarira

  3. #19
    Posts
    29
    Name:
    Tara Shankar
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: FOR HEARING AT CIC SCHEDULED ON 21ST APRIL-08. and clarification on sec 8(1)(g)


    Quote Originally Posted by jps50 View Post
    CIC as under:
    A Through this Order the Commission now wants to send the message loud and clear that quoting provisions of Section 8 of the RTI Act ad libitum to deny the information requested for, by CPIOs/Appellate Authorities without giving any justification or grounds as to how these provisions are applicable is simply unacceptable and clearly amounts to malafide denial of legitimate information attracting penalties under section 20.1 of the Act CIC/OK/A/2006/00163 dtd <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com</st1:date>7 July 2006
    B Reasons for rejection of requests
    The PIO has to give the reasons for rejection of the request for information as required under Section 7(8)(i). Merely quoting the bare clause of the Act does not imply that the
    reasons have been given. The PIO should have intimated as to how he had come to the conclusion that rule 8(1)(j) was applicable in this case CIC/OK/C/2006/00010 – <st1:date Month="7" Year="2006" Day="7">7 July 2006</st1:date>.
    Section 8.1.d relates only about such matters of commercial confidence in possession of public authority obtained from third party, the revelation of which would harm that third party. This section does not provide protection to public authority. It provides protection to third party only.
    Judgement of HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF <st1:City>DELHI </st1:City>in WP(C) No. 3114/2007 decided on 03.12.2007 :
    …As is reflected in its preambular paragraphs, the enactment seeks to promote transparency, arrest corruption and to hold the Government and its instrumentalities accountable to the governed. This spirit of the Act must be borne in mind while construing the provisions contained therein.
    Access to information under Section 3 of the Act, is the rule and exemptions under Section 8, the exception. Section 8 being a restriction on this fundamental right, must therefore is to be strictly construed. It should not be interpreted in manner as to shadow the very right itself
    Will you pl attach the decisions for downloading and taking a printout when attending appeals in this regard
    Thanks

  4. #20

    Re: FOR HEARING AT CIC SCHEDULED ON 21ST APRIL-08. and clarification on sec 8(1)(g)



    Are you looking for CIC decision on Umapathi's cases? Karira has already posted these at 13 above.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


About RTI INDIA

    RTI INDIA: Invoking Your Rights. We provide easy ways to request, analyze & share Government documents by use of Right to Information and by way of community support.

Follow us on

Twitter Facebook Apple App Store Google Play for Android