Already 2-3 threads are running on Review of decision. So at the risk of being labeled hijacker, and not finding it fit to start another thread on the same subject (However Moderators decision would be final and binding), can I dare share my concern. In one of my First appeal, FAA has decided and rejected my First Appeal, without giving me any notice of hearing, clearly siding untenable arguments of PIO (Voluminous, section 8(1)(j) etc). I feel in the light of judgment in post # 15 (Rajnish Singh v/s UPSC), this is fit case for review.
However I am preferring to go for II appeal instead, thinking that it will save my time. Is it OK?
› Find content similar to: When does one use a "review petition" to the CIC?