The Nodal Ministry, Department of Personnel and Training for Right to Information Act has earlier directed all the Ministries to keep the trail of all previous Public Information Officers in their website with effect from 1st January 2015.
One of the items to be disclosed proactively by the public authorities under Section 4(1)(b) pertains to the names, designations and other particulars of the Public Information Officers and its updation on yearly basis. It has been observed that in some of the public authorities, there are frequent changes at the level of the Central Public INformation Officer (CPIOs) and First Appellate Authorities (FAAs). During updation of the names and designations of the CPIOs / FAAs, the public authorities remove the names and designations of the earlier ones from their website.
The commission came heavily on the RTI applicant who wrote “cheated by SBI” above his name and signatures.
If such behavior continues on the part of the appellant, the Commission will have no option but to take action as per the law of the land. The appellant is advised to refrain from the use of such language in his communications in future.
The Public authority stated during the hearing that the appellant was in the habit of writing unpalatable words like “cheated by the SBI” and using unparliamentary language in his RTI applications Read more ›
Organisation is covered under RTI
It is not relevant if any organsation is covered under RTI or not, the public authority should give information which is available with him or which he can access from that organisation. In the recent matter which came up for hearing with CIC, Public Authority Canteen Stores Department, Mumbai denied information taking the plea that Unit Run Canteen (URC) is not a public authority.
“CPIO submitted that URC is not a public authority and hence information has been denied. “
Read more ›
The Central Information Commission while deciding the appeal held that an applicant cannot change the queries of his RTI application at the appeals stage.
In case the Appellant is interested in getting more information, he is at liberty to file a fresh RTI application to seek the same. Read more ›
The CPIO need not provide information regarding those proposals that were received, but were rejected and no disbursal was made.- CIC
He (the Appellant) has sought information regarding the financing proposals under the subsidy scheme, received by the bank from the District Rural Development Agency, Balasore.
Read more ›